Blog

uber employee or contractor

Going Dutch No Longer: The Court of Appeal Weighs in on Uber’s Arbitration Clause

The question of independent contractor versus employee has been a hot topic in the world of employment law for years now, and one that frequently makes news outside of legal circles. In a post for Canadian HR Reporter last year, we looked at the case of a Domino’s Pizza driver who gained publicity when the Ministry of Labour accepted his complaint, and determined that he was actually an employee and not an independent contractor. That driver was issued back pay to partially compensate for the misclassification.
Read More
probationary period at work

Probationary Periods

In the recent case of Van Wyngaarden v Thumper Massager Inc., the Ontario Divisional Court confirmed that unless a dismissal is in bad faith, an employer is entitled to dismiss an employee during the probationary period without cause and without notice.
Read More

Severance Pay and the Issue of Payroll

The most common requirements for an employee to be eligible for severance pay is that the employer must have a payroll of at least $2.5 million, and the employee must have been employed for at least 5 years.
Read More
jury duty

Jury duty and leave of absence

Like it or not, as a Canadian citizen, you are expected to serve jury duty when summoned by your jurisdiction’s courthouse. And as an employer, some of your staff may be absent for that reason.
Read More
Recreational Cannabis Use at Staff Party

The Rudner Law Annual Holiday Party Post: The Cannabis Edition

Although office holiday parties can be an amazing way to thank employees for their hard work all year, they can also be a minefield of potential liability for employers. This liability can crop up in any number of ways, including through harassing or offensive comments, inappropriate sexual or romantic advances, inadvertent discrimination, and excessive alcohol consumption. This year, in addition to these issues, employers also need to be prepared to deal with a brand new potential pitfall: the use of recreational cannabis.
Read More
marijuana at work

Negotiating the complexities of drug and alcohol policy and legalized recreational marijuana

Now that the use of recreational marijuana has been legalized, an employer’s existing drug and alcohol policies are unlikely to carry adequate wording to cover risks of applying unenforceable disciplinary procedures.
Read More

Workplace Investigations and Suspensions

We are dealing with investigations more and more often in the context of employment or HR law, and the reality is, as we often tell our employer clients, you cannot impose discipline, especially dismissal, until you investigate.
Read More
letter writing

An Open Letter Regarding Human Rights and the Ontario PC Party Resolution R4

The Lawyers of Rudner Law have penned the following open letter regarding the Ontario PC Party Resolution R4.
Read More

Accommodation for the Use of Cannabis in the Workplace for Medicinal Purposes

Employers don't have to condone recreational cannabis usage at work, and they can put policies in place to prevent employees from working while high. But, for employees who use cannabis for medicinal purposes, because of a disability, or because of addiction, which also classifies as a disability, employers do have to accommodate to the point of unreasonable hardship.
Read More
no smoking in the workplace

Signs Regarding No Smoking in the Workplace

Amidst all of the discussion surrounding cannabis in the workplace, many employers may have missed…

Read More

Can A Claim Be Brought Even When There is A Full and Final Release?

The question that I ask today, and I will answer today, is whether, despite having that full and final release, a claim can be brought. And the simple answer is yes, there are circumstances where courts will allow someone to bring a claim even after they signed a full and final release.
Read More
Eating at Work for time off

Enforcing Employment Standards Act is not a constructive dismissal

It is not unusual to hear about workers that work through their lunch break in order to leave early and have a condensed work day, or to store up the extra time and be able to leave early on Friday, thereby creating a condensed work week. While this might sound good in theory, the problem is that it is a breach of employment standards legislation. And that exposes the employer to liability.
Read More